Data Tables & Visualizations

Each of the three evaluation pillars is represented by a data table showing key indicators across our 9 candidate cities, accompanied by three visualizations that surface patterns in the data.

Pillar 1 Economic Strength

Evaluates each city's capacity to absorb Olympic-scale capital expenditure without triggering post-event fiscal crisis. Key indicators include GDP impact, total cost, revenue, and cost overrun percentages.

City Country Year Total Cost ($B) Revenue ($B) Cost Overrun (%) GDP Impact (%) Tourism Boost (%)
Milano-Cortina Italy 2026 4.5 3.8 45 0.6 12
Los Angeles USA 2028 6.9 7.5 15 0.3 8
French Alps France 2030 5.2 4.6 35 0.5 10
Brisbane Australia 2032 7.1 6.2 60 0.7 14
Salt Lake City USA 2034 3.8 4.1 20 0.4 9
Istanbul Turkey TBD 11.5 8.2 110 1.2 18
Santiago Chile TBD 9.3 6.5 95 1.5 16
Johannesburg South Africa TBD 10.8 7.1 130 1.8 20
Trojena Saudi Arabia TBD 14.2 9.8 70 1.0 22
Total Cost per City ($B)
Cost Overrun (%)
GDP Impact (%)

Interactive Ideas (M3/M4)

For the economic pillar, interactive features could focus on comparing financial performance across cities. Users could toggle between confirmed hosts and candidate cities to see how projected costs and GDP impacts differ. A hover interaction can reveal detailed values such as total cost, revenue, and GDP impact for each city, while a sorting option allows users to rank cities by cost efficiency or economic return. Additionally, linking the GDP impact chart with the cost and overrun charts could help users understand how financial risk and economic benefit relate across different host scenarios.

Pillar 2 Infrastructure Capacity

Measures structural preparedness — transit networks, hotel capacity, airport throughput, and existing venue inventory. Cities with strong existing infrastructure avoid building financially ruinous "white elephants."

/*faked need to be align with real data*/ /*faked need to be align with real data*/
City Country Hotel Rooms Transit Score (0-100) Airport (Mpax/yr) Rail (km) Road Density (km/km²)
Milano-Cortina Italy 50000 62 35 900 2.0
Los Angeles USA 110000 28 88 1600 3.5
French Alps France 45000 15 12 850 1.8
Brisbane Australia 40000 38 23 700 2.4
Salt Lake City USA 30000 24 26 550 2.1
Istanbul Turkey 140000 55 64 2200 3.8
Santiago Chile 55000 44 22 800 2.6
Johannesburg South Africa 60000 19 21 650 2.3
Trojena Saudi Arabia 25000 3 3 300 1.2
Hotel Room Count by City
Infrastructure Readiness — City Filter
Transit Score Ranking

Interactive Ideas (M3/M4)

For the infrastructure pillar, interactive features could focus on exploring capacity and readiness across cities. Users can filter the radar chart to view different cities and compare their infrastructure profiles, including hotel capacity, transit score, and airport connectivity. The transit score pictogram allows quick visual comparison, with hover interactions highlighting each city’s relative performance. Additionally, linking the hotel capacity chart with the radar view can help users understand how individual infrastructure components contribute to overall readiness.

Pillar 3 Sustainability & Legacy

Assesses long-term environmental impact and alignment with natural urban growth. Core metrics include air quality (PM2.5, NO2), green space coverage (NDVI), and whether the Olympic footprint sits within projected urban densification zones.

/*faked need to be align with real data*/ /*faked need to be align with real data*/
City Country PM2.5 (µg/m³) NO2 (µg/m³) SO2 (µg/m³) NDVI (0-1) Urban Growth (%/yr)
Milano-Cortina Italy 14.8 28 4 0.55 0.3
Los Angeles USA 11.6 32 3 0.35 0.6
French Alps France 7.6 18 2 0.70 0.2
Brisbane Australia 6.9 15 2 0.65 1.2
Salt Lake City USA 9.8 20 3 0.45 0.8
Istanbul Turkey 24.7 40 6 0.30 1.5
Santiago Chile 21.3 35 5 0.25 1.4
Johannesburg South Africa 27.5 38 7 0.20 1.8
Trojena Saudi Arabia 7.2 12 2 0.15 2.5
PM2.5 Levels by City (µg/m³)
NDVI Green Space Index
Urban Growth Rate vs PM2.5

Interactive Ideas (M3/M4)

Interactive features for the sustainability pillar include hover comparisons across PM2.5 levels, compact NDVI visual summaries, and a scatter plot to explore the relationship between urban growth and air quality. These interactions allow users to identify patterns and trade-offs between development and environmental performance.